UA-100768763-1 Jump to content

MisterPL

Members
  • Posts

    9,081
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MisterPL

  1. I've obviously not seen the updated trek stuff, but I remember reading that all they were touching up were the ship models and special effects. By special effects I'm assuming they mean transporer shimmer/ Phaser blasts that kind of thing. I can't imagine seeing a wobbly cgi Gorn fight Kirk in Arena. Would I be right in my assumptions?

    Somewhat.

    It's actually pretty scary seeing the CG-1701 flying in the same wonky path as its predecessor. They were a little TOO faithful to the source material as far as I'm concerned. I'd have taken a few more liberties when it came to establishing shots, but you can tell there's either a profound reverence for the original or a fear of upsetting a 40-year-old fanbase.

    They've done a very good job replicating certain shots, but even to a flaw. There are shots of the Enterprise that always bugged me because it looked like the ship was skidding along a strange axis, no doubt due to the more primitive effects of the day. But like Yoda's jiggling Muppet ears, the animators have duplicated it as if to say to the fans, "See? All we did was replace it. All the flaws are there, too, it just looks better." I'm still hoping that greater leeway will be given in future episodes.

    I'll say this for the space shots, though: The planets look stunning. And the aztec patterns on the ships are perfectly subtle, as if you're simply noticing something that's always been there because your prescription lenses changed.

    As far as transporter and phaser effects, I've noticed very little in the way of change. It looks cleaned up but nothing looks like a 2006 effect misplaced in a 1966 TV series. No CG Gorn but I'm kinda hoping for a CG NOMAD to replace that shaky martini mixer. Removing the wires may not be enough.

    But if you want to see for yourself, click here for before and after images. These pics are worth a thousand words.

  2. If DC Direct eventually dedcides to do boxed sets like they did with the Pocket Superheroes line which teams or groupings should they do?

    See, when you mention "Pocket Superheroes" in the same sentence as "boxed sets," I can't help thinking "last ditch effort." :tongue:

    That said, I can see DCD offering sets based on Batman, Superman, and Green Lantern no problem.

    Historically, here's what DCD has invested in when it comes to boxed sets:

    The Endless

    Legion of Super-Heroes

    JSA

    JSA 2

    JSA 3

    JSA Villains

    Preacher

    WildC.A.T.S.

    The Dreaming

    Green Lanterns

    Gren Lanterns 2

    New Teen Titans

    Flash

    Danger Girls

    Silver Age JLA

    Metal Men

    Smallville

    Dark Knight

    And that's just PVC sets.

    Big thanks to Joe Acevedo for creating and maintaining such a damn fine resource! :thumbsup:

  3. What I find really interesting is the backlash leveled at Lucas for tweaking the original SW trilogy, but I don't see similar complaints against Trek. Is it because the Trek changes are more cosmetic vs character as seen in SW? (I'm all for the Trek changes and hate the SW changes - but when I compare the two, I'm having a tough time deciding why that is, even for myself...) Maybe it's just an anti-Lucas sentiment in the fan community?

    Personally the changes to Trek make it better. The changes to Star Wars only made it different at best and in a couple instances worse.

    Lucas shows a lot less respect for his own work (and the efforts of the hundreds of others who produced Star Wars) than the folks in charge of altering TOS. Of course the people in charge of this remastering are FANS. Perhaps if Gene Roddenberry had the chance Lucas did, he'd have made more sweeping changes altogether. (IE - Klingons with ridged heads because, as Lucas put it with Jabba, "That was always my intention.")

  4. Just wondering how Minimates collectors would like to see the inevitable character variants handled.

    One of the things that is KILLING interest in DCD's standard figure line is an overabundance of DC's most popular characters in contemporary, artist-specific designs. They've offered Superman in the same classic costume about 16 times over seven years. Some of these were artist-specific (Frank Miller, Michael Turner, Ed McGuinness, et al), others were generic and simply featured resculpted noggins (stern, angry, or just plain different), while one was a weird hybrid (John Byrne head on an Alex Ross body).

    I understand that newbies should be able to start collecting a line like this at any time. A year or two from now anyone should be able to go into a store and find DC's most venerable characters in Minimate form and start collecting from there. Popular characters NEED to be available and they NEED to be recognizable. But how does that impact us, the veteran collectors?

    Personally I'm all for costume variants. Some can be significant (Modern Age Superman Red & Blue), some subtle (Silver Age Superman Red & Blue). So long as they're based on existing source material – preferably comics – I've got no problem with a change in costume. Likewise when a different character is in the costume, it can make a difference. Green Lantern, Flash, and even Batman have had other people donning different suits to play the character. That's cool, too.

    What I'm not cool with are artist-specific versions. I'm NOT looking forward to seeing another Superman Minimate but this time with line art on his face and torso lifted from art in the last story arc of Action Comics. I've little interest in collecting a line of modern Superman characters wearing identical outfits but inspired by the Artist of the Month. I'd much rather see the above costume variants.

    If DC really need to infuse more Superman (or Batman or Wonder Woman or Green Lantern) Minimates into the line for late-to-the-party collectors, let it be in the form of a catch-up boxed gift set, an instant collection starter. Otherwise gimme a Black-suited Superman over a Jim Lee version any day.

    Thoughts?

  5. DC Direct has pretty much shown me that anything goes with their line of Minimates. Aside from characters that would be almost impossible to offer (like Starro or Mr. Mind) it's pretty much a crapshoot as to what will be offered next. But hey, let's take a stab at it anyway. B)

    Here's my guess:

    Catwoman & Mr. Freeze

    Atom & Elongated Man

    Saturn Girl & Lightning Lad

    Silver Age Superman Red & Lois Lane

    I was tempted to add Apollo & Midnighter because they've been offered by DCD before but I'd actually be surprised if any characters were offered outside the DCU (which means no Wildstorm, no Vertigo, and no MAD). And it seems like they're sticking to the Silver and Modern Age for now so I think I've got some pretty safe bets.

    Next?

  6. Between the movie, the remastered original series, and the announcement of 2-inch Minimates (with pics!) I'm actually getting stoked about this property all over again.

    I've been waiting years for Trek Minimates in scale with my Marvel and DC figures and it looks like it's finally gonna happen. I'm eager to see what JJ Abrams can bring to the film franchise (though I really do believe Trek's home should be exclusively TV, not cinema). And if someone told me that something as simple as updating the visual effects would make TOS must-see TV after 40 years, I don't know that I'd have believed them.

    Everything old is new again! I love it! :bunny:

×
×
  • Create New...