SErge Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 whoa with this scarlett Johansson minimate and world of psychic peter, can you say Lost in translation customs? but seriously awesome black widow! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystery Man Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 Why are they putting out another Mark I armor? Ah well. Good lookin' figures, all the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mirymate Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Um... Wouldn't it been easier to release the Black Widow with the Senate Tony and skip the line padding re-releases? And what about the Mark VI? Or the much rumored armored Whiplash? Sorry just seems like padding to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TM2 Dinobot Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 As for the Mark 2 with Jim Rhodes - I'm sure it ties into the movie, but it's the cleverest reissue of a variant that not the variant they've done so far. You noticed that too, did you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkknighthero15 Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 according to the title card at toyfair, these will be hitting stores on march 10th now, not the third http://i.marvelousnews.com/g/index.php?mod...800&start=0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain_cbecker Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 according to the title card at toyfair, these will be hitting stores on march 10th now, not the third http://i.marvelousnews.com/g/index.php?mod...800&start=0 I'd be surprised if it was the 3rd or the 10th... DST's relaease dates are more voodoo & witchcraft than science. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MINI_MYTE Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 according to the title card at toyfair, these will be hitting stores on march 10th now, not the third http://i.marvelousnews.com/g/index.php?mod...800&start=0 Actually, the '10 refers to the year (2010), not the day of the month. Just look at the other cards on display. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthRaider Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 Well, in any case that still means we'll be seeing them in March this year. Sure beats waiting for our bank accounts to suffer nerve spasms from the bazillions sets all coming out at the same time in December Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minimadman Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 (edited) according to the title card at toyfair, these will be hitting stores on march 10th now, not the third http://i.marvelousnews.com/g/index.php?mod...800&start=0 That's March 2010 not March 10th notice the apostrophe to the left of the 10. Edited February 15, 2010 by minimadman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkknighthero15 Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 (edited) yiiiiikes. my bad, everyone. wishful thinking devieved mine eyes. Edited February 16, 2010 by darkknighthero15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDurg Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Sorry if this has been discussed already! Alright, this is probably an incredibly stupid idea and is just pure speculation, but I got down to thinking. Could it be possible the "Hammer Drone" is actually Justin Hammer? I mean, the Drone kind of looks like it's wearing glasses, and on top of that it's the only "Drone" that has a humanoid appearance. Not to mention in the trailer we saw, none of the robots IM/WM are fighting look anything like the "Hammer Drone". It probably will just end up being something of a prototype, but I'm just hopeful we'll see a villain with better armor than Whiplash. By the looks of things with that pile of junk on he wouldn't last long against Iron Man, let alone him and War Machine, so I'm thinking we'll see another villain after him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mirymate Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I don't know, McDurg. I think I'd be a little ticked if Hammer actually armors up for a final confrontation with Stark. No, not because he's never done it in the 616, but because the writers/director have gone out of their way to avoid a straight up armored guy v. armored guy final fight. I mean, it's why Vanko is Whiplash this time around instead of the Crimson Dynamo. And if we were going to have an outright armored antagonist, I'd rather it have been a cool looking Dynamo. All of which doesn't mean your guess is wrong. I'd just be disappointed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzerd Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Before the Hammer Drone was revealed DST was referring to it as the "mysterious army builder". Army = more than one, so it probably won't be Hammer in a suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karamazov80 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I don't know, McDurg. I think I'd be a little ticked if Hammer actually armors up for a final confrontation with Stark. No, not because he's never done it in the 616, but because the writers/director have gone out of their way to avoid a straight up armored guy v. armored guy final fight. I mean, it's why Vanko is Whiplash this time around instead of the Crimson Dynamo. And if we were going to have an outright armored antagonist, I'd rather it have been a cool looking Dynamo. All of which doesn't mean your guess is wrong. I'd just be disappointed. I feel similarly. It would be so lazy and predictable. However, film producers have rarely gone broke relying on the lazy and predictable! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtle Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I have nothing against a straight-up armor guy v. armor guy final fight in general, but in IM2 I'm against it, especially if it involves Stark's corporate rival suiting up in Iron Man knock-off armor... again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TM2 Dinobot Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 We showed Iron Man II director Jon Favreau, who also plays the role of Happy Hogan in the movie, the new Diamond Select Toys Marvel Minimate figure based on his character and asked him what he thought about it on Twitter. His response, "It's a dream come true!" http://marvelousnews.com/index.php?catid=23&itemid=12817 EPIC!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthRaider Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 I love how enthusiastic he is over the Minimateized Happy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtman Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 now thats one cool director Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minimadman Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 Here's a video of him giving the first Iron Man minimates an enthusiastic look over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twisted Two-Face Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 (edited) Oh dear....why Go, why?!?! Confirmation on Mark V, thanks to Mega Blocks: *facepalm* What a fantastic look for Mr. Stark. Lack of a crotch must be hell. Edited February 22, 2010 by Twisted Two-Face Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDurg Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Honestly, it doesn't look that bad. Some of you are making this out to be as bad as Barakapool. What, there can't be a sleeker armor? If it's any consolation, Stark is constantly changing/upgrading armors, so I doubt you'll see this armor beyond the end of IM2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mirymate Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 End? It'll be replaced in before the last act by the Mark VI. I haven't seen enough to judge one way or the other. It's hard to tell anything from this Mega Blok thing, and the only other thing we've seen are purloined prototype toy pics and a fuzzy back of package picture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punisher Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 I don't think it's bad. It's Silver Centurion. It's sleeker, but what about Extremis? He wore a skin tight suit that armor flew onto. Or what about the 70's version? That was pretty sleek. People just don't like change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthRaider Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 See, all this does for me now is bring up the whole "which armor is REALLY showing up in wave 35?" can of worms all over again. I keep forgetting which Iron Man is which whenever I check the wave proto pics... There's the Mark III from the first movie, the rumored Extremis-looking one (which is apparently Mark VI), and now the Silver Centurion-looking one (which now appears to be Mark V). So that makes hypothetically three red armors from the sequel we just have to worry about memorizing. But WAIT! The regular wave only has TWO Iron Man slots, with the old Mark III already being one of them. Which means that the "leftover" armor will be a TRU exclusive. ... ... ... uh oh. EDIT: ... and I just realized I must've skipped Mark IV somewhere. Egads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzerd Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Mark IV is the one we know of in Wave 35. It's fairly similar to Mark III. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.