UA-100768763-1 Jump to content

Licenses We Are Developing But Haven't Announced


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

X-Babies?

Pass.

Little Big-Head men?

Pass.

Tigers and vehicles?

Yes please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another kind of character extension for Marvel could be the Fox films.

 

It's also possible that, if Sales thinks there's enough demand, DST might actually be interested in revisiting some previous properties they formerly considered to be past their prime. (Warriors Three movie 'mates?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, buttheadsmate said:

Not Brand Echh .........it'll never happen but if it did I'd never moan about anything ever again  :jawdrop:

Believe it when I see it.:worms:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a fact that I moan a lot about the things that frustrate me about the Minimate line & my recent 'outburst' about theToad was the first time in many a long day that things boiled over . It'll be a sad day when I just don't care about Minimates & I have seen better men than I fall by the wayside recently.

You should read up on where 'can of worms ' originated    .........very interesting reading :thumbsup:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the Marvel TV license is broken up by network (ABC - SHIELD, Inhumans, New Warriors, Cloak and Dagger) or if each of those counts as a separate extension.  Oh, and Runaways on HULU (which is also ABC related)

Edited by JeffBohn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disney has the rights for Marvel television. They're not letting that go. They'll keep producing the shows under the ABC banner with production partners wherever they can find them.

 

As for licensing, I'm fairly certain that they're separate agreements like the films. There's a licensing program for Runaways but it's comic-based. They generally wait to see if there's enough interest in a property like this before tailoring a program to it. Hopefully it does well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes, that was the Marvel expansion. The distribution is different than I expected, but it's an area we had not explored previously (Marvel games), unless you count video-game-accurate costume changes for Cable in the box set and Dazzler in series 54 (?). And MvC3.

The game license is not Street Fighter, but it is one with a similarly long history.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DSTZach said:

We have not done it before, but other companies have. Not Injustice, this is a franchise with some history.

Not sure we'll show anything before Toy Fair, just FYI. And not sure they'll let me announce at NYCC.

Next best thing. Mortal Kombat?

And if not, what do you mean by "franchise with history"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...